MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025392917

2011 WINGS #23-11 Equal Pay Day

2011· other· en· W7025392917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Work (physics)Diversity (politics)Gender pay gapAdaptation (eye)Bridge (graph theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Description: Equal Pay Day is the date on which women have completed the extra work needed to match what their male counterparts earned in just one year. Compared to the US, Canada, and even Europe, Australia's pay gap is one of the smallest - but Australian women are working hard to bridge it. Host(s): Maja Graham of Women on the Line Featured Speakers/Guests: Bridgette Engeler Newbury, Marketing Dir.,BPW (Business and Professional Women) Australia; Sandra Cook, Deputy Chair of economic Security4Women;Nareen Young, CEO, Diversity Council Australia. Credits: Interviews and production for WOL by Maja Graham; adaptation for WINGS by Frieda Werden. Women on the Line Theme Music: "Slide Show at Free University" by Le Tigre. Comments: Canada's Equal Pay Day in 2011 was March 18.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6810.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207