Where the industry led them: urban growth of the Marvila and Beato boroughs since 1835
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Up to the second quarter of the 19th century, Marvila and Beato were farming districts at Lisbon's eastern border, courtyards for the leisure of the aristocratic classes and places of ecclesiastic seclusion, along with their lengthy cultivated properties. With the industry's arrival, a new path begins for these boroughs: the old convents, after the extinction in Portugal of all religious orders, are reborn as industrial sites; working-class housing multiplies. With increasing industrial growth and the settling of large warehouses in the region, the landscape thickened, with embankments which brought a whole new scale. At the end of the 20th century, the industry lost its pace, and the riverside Marvila and Beato became deserted. Presently, a return is on the way to this (almost) forgotten boroughs. This essay follows the region's urban development using its old cartography, attempting to foresee urban revitalization from the indelible marks of a growth led by the industry's pace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".