MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025696275

Written Testimony to The United States Senate, Special Committee on Aging, “Beyond 9 to 5: Dismantling Barriers and Building Economic Resilience for Older Workers”

2023· report· en· W7025696275 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Digital Archive (New York University Florence) · 2023
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityUniversity of Texas at El PasoWashington University in St. Louis
KeywordsState (computer science)HonorPopulationResilience (materials science)Psychological resilience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thank you, Senators Casey and Braun, for inviting me to testify today. It is an honor to be before this Committee, particularly Senator Gillibrand from my adopted home state of New York, and Senator Braun, representing my loving in-laws from the great state of Indiana. Senators, all of your efforts on the issues affecting the health and economic well-being of our aging population is vital to not just for older adults and their families, but for our entire society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Digital Archive (New York University Florence)Same topicQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsFrench-language works237,207