MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025768443

ZUHMA – SUHME – SUHNE/İ ACCORDİNG TO THE CUNEIFORM SOURCES

2017· article· en· W7025768443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiographical and Historical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuneiformHittite languagePeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The word of Zuhma; as a name of toponym, has been discovered in historical recordings for the first time in a Hittite treaty, the text of Mita of Pahhuwa (KUB XXIII 72 + KUB XL 10 + KBo L 66 + KBo L 216 + KBo L 218) in the last quarter of 15th century B.C.E. Later, after 12th century B.C.E the same territory appears as Suhmu, Suhme and Suhne/i in Assyrian cuneiform recordings. According to the new Assyrian resources; this area is the land, where can be arrived aftercrossing Murat river from south to north. Written documents indicate that the land of Suhme/Suhne/i has been located on Bingöl and its vicinity. Bingöl, where has been come under the domination of Urartu with the period of King Menua (810-785 B.C.), as understood from Urartian cuneiform documents has been divided into small administrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it