Орфофонія англійських голосних у спонтанному мовленні британців, американців та канадійців \n(The orthothony of English vowels in spontaneous speaking of the British, Americans and Canadians)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
У статті представлені результати слухового (аудитивного) аналізу орфофонії англійських голосних фонем /ɪ/, /iː/, /e/, /æ/, /ɜː/, /ʊ/, /uː/, /ᴧ/, /ɔː/, /ɔ/, /ɑː/ у спонтанному мовленні дикторів-чоловіків-носіїв орфоепічної норми британського, американського та канадійського національних варіантів англійської мови в наголошеній позиції фонетичного слова. \n(The article presents the results of the auditory analysis of the English stressed vowel phonemes /ɪ/, /iː/, /e/, /æ/, /ɜː/, /ʊ/, /uː/, /ᴧ/, /ɔː/, /ɔ/, /ɑː/ in spontaneous speaking of native male speakers of British, American and Canadian English whose pronunciation corresponds to the norms of the standard pronunciation of the varieties of English under consideration.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".