MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026131574

第7届英国-北美科学史学会联合会会议纪要

2012· other· zh· W7026131574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute for History of Natural Sciences) · 2012
Typeother
Languagezh
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Period (music)SketchProduct (mathematics)History of science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2012年7月11~14日,第7届英国-北美科学史学会联合会议(Seventh British-North American Joint Meeting of the BSHS,CSHPS,and HSS)在美国费城召开.此次会议由英国科学史学会(British Society for the History of Science,BSHS)、加拿大科学史与科学哲学学会(Canadian Society for the History and Philosophy of Science,CSHPS)以及科学史学会(History of Science Society,HSS,美国)联合主办,每个学会分设组委会,各由4~6名执行委员组成.大会另设项目主席3名,分别是来自英国约克大学的克拉克(Sabine Clarke)、美国普林斯顿大学的克里杰(Angela Creager)和加拿大圭尔夫大学的拉夏贝尔(Sofie Lachappelle).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repository of Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute for History of Natural Sciences)Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207