The Agbiotech Bulletin, Volume 4 Issue 2, February, 1996
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Agbiotech Bulletin Volume 4 Issue 2, February, 1996 Published by AG-WEST BIOTECH INC. Code Number:NL96004 Size of Files: Text: No associated graphics files [If you are willing to collaborate in the Reader's Survey of this Bulletin, please click{A HREF="http://www.lights.com/agwest/survey.html"} here{/A}.] Ag-West President Moves On NEWS POS Research Aids Nigerian Paint Industry Fireflies Light Up Food Bacteria Three New Bio-pesticides Identified Gene Mapping Tops Profit Predictions Fungal Resistance in Transgenic Carrots Biotech vs. PCB Contamination NewLeaf Potato Approved for Canada Genetic Resistance in Rice "Canadian" Enzymes to Aid Chinese Poultry REGULATORY Novel Foods Guidelines Canadian Regs More Efficient: Report Biotech Corn Comes to Ontario International Approvals of Transgenics LEGAL AFFAIRS Ohio Vegetable Law Applauded SYNSORB Biotech Patents New Tech Application EVENTS AgBiotech International Conference Perspectives On Protein Engineering Environmental Mutagen Society Meeting Canadian Phytopathological Society Meeting TRENDS Saskatoon: The New Agbiotech "Heartland" Venture Capital Invested in Agbiotech Substantive Agbiotech Growth Expected Pioneer, Human Genome Collaborate on Corn Amoco and Stone & Webster Team Up on Ethanol Japan Tobacco/Monsanto Collaborate on Rice Ecogen/Monsanto Allied on Bt Roche/Zeneca Developing PUFAs Majors Combine Forces on Chemical Bioremediation TECHTRANSFER Screening For Canola Blackleg FINANCE Foodlinks Opens New Markets $25 Million Boost for University Research NovaDx Financing Efforts to Support Osteoporosis Program ISSUES Epstein rbST Study Questioned Biotech Priority Issue for CAC RESOURCES AGCare Head Office Change National Agbiotech Council Moves Sask Ag & Food Home Page Innovation Place Iowa Biotech Education Publication Available SRC Foodline New Canola Info Service for Saskatoon Therapeutics from the Field Global Herbicide Directory PEOPLE WATCH Andrew Fraser Award Calgene Prairie Swine Centre Inc. IRAP Alberta Research Council. PENCE Canadian Agrifood Research Council We Welcome Your Input The AgBiotech Bulletin welcomes submissions of news, ideas and articles from subscribers. Information about new developments at your company or institution, notices about new products or resources, or observations about events and opportunities affecting the agbiotech industry will be considered for publication. Please put us on your mailing list for press releases. Story ideas and submissions are also welcome. Contact: Debbie Lepage, Ag-West Biotech Inc., 230 - 111 Research Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Canada S7N 3R2; phone 306/975-1939; fax 306/975-1966; e-mail: agwest@innovplace.saskatoon.sk.ca Fax or e-mail Your News to The Agbiotech Bulletin Fax your company's news releases or information about new developments to us at 306/975-1966; or e-mail the same to agwest@innovplace.saskatoon.sk.ca Credits: The Agbiotech Bulletin is published 12 times per year on behalf of Ag-West Biotech Inc. by Westcross House Publications, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7K OR1, e-mail: signatur@eagle.wbm.ca Ag-West Biotech can be reached at 230-111 Research Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 3R2, e-mail: agwest@innovplace.saskatoon.sk.ca World Wide Web: http://www.lights.com/agwest/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.389 | 0.440 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".