MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026512727

Agricultural Policies in the Western Hemisphere

2017· article· en· W7026512727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInter-American Development Bank
KeywordsAgricultureIndustrialisationGovernment (linguistics)UrbanizationAgrarian societyPopulationLatin AmericansWestern hemisphereGross domestic product
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Western Hemisphe~e for the most part depends heavily on agriculture.Almost three-fourths of the Hemisphere's fast-growing pop~lation is concen trated in tropical countries with a pronounct~d dependence on farm output.In Latin America approximately one-half of the population is rural, and the agri cultural sector accounts for more than one-fifth of the gross national product and one-half of total export earnings.The agricultural policies of most Hemisphere countries in recent years re flect the growing need to expand agricultural production through technology, the opening of new lands, and the varying of crops.These policies often try to cope at the same time with social and economic problems inherent in a tradi tional agrarian structure.Increased and diversified output in an updated farm structure, however, is not the only general aim of most Western Hemisphere nations.A growing trend toward urbanization and industrialization has created new problems, first in supplying urban centers when transportation and marketing facilities are lacking, and second in coordinating national goa18 of agriculture and indust~J to meet the overall economic goals of increased employment and in come.Price support programs, for example, have been almost universally intro duced.And in recent years, guaranteed minimum producer prices have been established for domestic food crops to ensure adequate supplies throughout Latin America.Prices are usually supported by Government purchase and storage programs.Both Government and semiautonomous agencies provide monopolies for marketing principal exports crops in Canada, Brazil, and Colombia and are im portant in price stabilization programs elsewhere.Government food suP?ly agencies have been established in many countries.The effectiveness of price support programs, however, is often limited by inadequate storage and marketing facilities and subsidy costs.Research, extension, and credit programs to stimulate improved technology in agriculture have received emphasis in most countries during the past two decades.Latin American agriculture receives substantial assistance from the United States, as well as from international and private organizations.This assistance has been augmented and integrated unde.r the Alliance for Progress Program, signed by the United States and 19 Latin American nations in August 1961.The Alliance program is administered within the framework of the Organi zation of American States (OAS), which is respon~ible for the coordination of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207