MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026515010

Adapting Regenerative Braking Strength to Driver Preference

2023· dissertation· en· W7026515010 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsRegenerative brakeAutomotive industryController (irrigation)PowertrainControl (management)Identification (biology)Adaptation (eye)Active safety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern automotive industry has witnessed a growing emphasis on adapting the driving experience to individual drivers. With the rising popularity of electrified vehicles, the implementation of regenerative braking systems, specifically lift-off regenerative braking, has become a focal point. However, research indicates that drivers often find the predefined deceleration response during lift-off regenerative braking to be undesirable. This thesis addresses this issue by developing an adaptive regenerative braking controller that learns driver preferences, thereby fulfilling the objective of enhancing the driving experience of lift-off regenerative braking systems by reducing driver fatigue through the minimization of pedal interventions. The research focuses on three critical aspects: accurate identification of driving conditions, acquisition of driver preferences for lift-off regenerative braking, and compatibility with real-time automotive hardware. By leveraging advanced techniques like HDBSCAN clustering, fuzzy logic inference, and online Q-learning, the research achieves accurate driving condition identification and adaptation to individual driver preferences in a control scheme that can be practically deployed in-vehicle. Real-world testing demonstrates the controller's 80.9 % accuracy in identifying driving conditions as well as its successful learning of the driver's preferred deceleration to within 1.9 %. Subsequently, the adaptive regenerative braking controller results in a 23.2 % reduction in pedal interventions during deceleration compared to a baseline that is representative of an industry-standard implementation of lift-off regenerative braking. This outcome underscores the controller's potential to alleviate driver fatigue and enhance the overall driving experience. This research contributes to the advancement of electrified vehicle powertrain control, focusing on improving driver acceptance and satisfaction with regenerative braking systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207