Bibliographic record
Abstract
Terry Sacrey is an informed and well thought-out force for rational behaviour. He talks with Smashlock and I about what it is like living as a nonbeliever in Newfoundland, the province most North-Easterly in Canada, as well as many other thoughts that demonstrate that he is an engaged person. He writes, he hosts on Reap Sow Radio, and he connects with other thinkers online. Special thanks to his wife for clearly being such a good humoured person putting up with Terry's troublemaking friends and letting us have him for a couple hours ;) Apologies for the first half hour's worth of the interview having some audio issues, they do clear up but sorry just the same. Check his links below and enjoy the show! Terry Sacrey Terry's site on Tumblr: The Analyzed Atheist http://analyzedatheist.tumblr.com Terry can be heard weekly co-hosting Reap Sow Radio http://reapsowradio.com Terry's interview on the Atheist Asshole http://atheistasshole.wordpress.com/tag/terry-sacrey/ Terry's interview on the Angry Atheist http://angryatheist.info/?p=4392
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.626 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".