MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026638272

Analyzing and detecting social spammers with robust features

2017· dissertation· en· W7026638272 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsSpammingTask (project management)Social network (sociolinguistics)Evasion (ethics)Robustness (evolution)Spambot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of online social networks has attracted an increasing number of social spammers.Spammers gain profits by posting various content such as rumors and malwares.These behaviors greatly compromise social networks' privacy and security, and endanger the whole network community.In the last few years, researchers have proposed a number of spam detection strategies.However, spammers become harder to be detected as they constantly evolve to evade detection by emulating legitimate users and hiding spam patterns.Many detection methods become ineffective.In this thesis, we aim to design spam detection methods using features that are resilient to evolving spammers.To achieve this goal, we first conduct an in-depth analysis on different properties of user accounts.We study the Twitter accounts and extract four kinds of features: profile-based, content-based, community-based and time-based features.By analyzing evasion techniques used by current spammers, we find that the commonly-used profile and content-based features are not effective enough to uncover cunning spammers.This is because these features can be easily emulated by spammers.To tackle this issue, we investigate the structural properties of Twitter network topologies and propose communitybased features.These community-based features are more robust than profile-based and content-based features due to the fact that community structure is determined by multiple accounts collectively.Compared to a normal user, a spammer is more likely to connect with other spammers.Moreover, we find that spammers often need to fulfill a task in a short period of time to reduce costs.Based on this phenomenon, we design new timebased features to capture spam outbreaks.In addition to effectiveness, we also consider efficiency as another important factor.We select computation-efficient features as potential candidates by comparing the time of feature construction.Our data-driven evaluation demonstrates that our advanced features largely improve the performance of the spam detection system.While achieving an even lower false positive rate, the detection rate increases by 16% and f1 score increases by over 10% when applying our feature set.6 Conclusion and Future Work 6.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207