Approach to flood risk management in heritage sites in rural localities. The case of Cura Malal (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The general objective of the research is to assess the risk of flooding in the heritage sites of the rural locality Cura Malal (Buenos Aires, Argentina) by applying the methodology proposed by CCI – ICCROM. The purpose is to make a first approach to risk management at the local level, constituting the initial step of a process of greater scope, which can be developed in the future in the national context, due to the lack of studies of this type. For the purpose of the work, the methodological and conceptual proposal established by the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property and the Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) is adopted (2017), complemented by in-depth interviews with key informants from the governmental and non-governmental spheres and the preparation of thematic cartography, based on the use of GIS (Geographic Information Systems). As a result, the magnitude of the flood risk of the analyzed heritage sites is calculated, which allows determining the degree of priority of intervention in those spaces, to mitigate the impacts before the occurrence of the event in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it