Analysis of mobile residues of E. coli citrate synthase using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
E. coli Citrate Synthase (CS) is a large hexameric protein with a molecular weight of 280kDa and belonging to the type II class of citrate synthases. The crystal structure of E. coli CS in the T (inactive) state is known. The structure shows that the backbone atoms of 42 residues (1-5, 266-297 and 330-335) have temperature factors about 9 times greater than the average as compared to the rest of the molecule. Residues 266-297, also referred to as the âMobile loopâ, are particularly of interest since they form a part of the active site and any rearrangement in the mobile loop can provide useful information about the R(active) state of the protein. In this study, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy has been used to study the flexible regions of E. coli CS in solution. The flexible residues have been assigned based on the amino acid type by 15N-specific amino acid labeling, while the residue type has been assigned by site-directed mutagenesis. Changes in the dynamics of the flexible residues, in response to the substrate binding, have been studied using both NMR and Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Also a method to use Mass Spectrometry for accessing the isotopic incorporation in the samples prepared for NMR spectroscopy has been described. The initial hypothesis in this study was that only the mobile loop residues which show significant high B-factors will contribute to the NMR spectrum. However in the NMR spectrum, in addition to the mobile loop, some uncharacterized flexible regions were also observed. We also found that some of the residues show signs of slow conformational exchange resulting in multiple signals in the NMR spectrum. In addition we see that the environment of some flexible residues is changed in the presence of substrates, a few residues were immobilized, but most remained mobile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".