MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026765740

Applicability of the ISO 14001 environmental managemen system standard to Manitoba hydro

2007· other· en· W7026765740 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsISO 14000Environmental management systemAuditProcess (computing)International standardQuality of analytical resultsManagement systemWork (physics)Software
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this thesis was to study and document the process and effects of applying, or conforming an Environmental Management System (EMS) to the international ISO 14001 EMS Standard in general, and more specifically, for an integrated electric utility such as Manitoba Hydro. In addition, an environmental management software package was evaluated, to determine its usefulness as a tool in developing, implementing and managing the above mentioned EMS. An overview of environmental charters/guidelines, industrial initiatives and other EMS systems is presented to illustrate their roles in the eventual creation of the ISO 14000 series of environmental management standards. ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems - Specification with guidance for use is the fundamental part of the ISO 14000 series of environmental management standards. It defines a systematic process, by which organizations can identify and manage their environmental responsibilities and commitments, and may be objectively verified as evidence of their commitment should they so choose. ISO 14004 is a guidance document created to assist in implementing the ISO 14001 standard. Three auditing standards, that may be used with ISO 14001 are also discussed. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.141
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicRadioactive Decay and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207