The Association between Social Isolation, Functional Social Support, and Memory: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social support is a widely investigated, modifiable factor thought to promote memory function and successful aging. However, the intertwined effects of the two components of social support – objective social isolation and subjective functional social support – on memory are less understood. Therefore, we explored whether social isolation was associated with memory function in middle-aged and older adults, and whether this association was mediated by functional social support. We also examined moderated mediation by age group and sex. \nWe analyzed data from the baseline and first follow-up waves of the Tracking Cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. These data included a derived variable for social isolation, a standardized instrument for self-reported functional social support, and a combined immediate and delayed recall memory score from a modified version of the Rey Auditory Visual Learning Test. Using multiple linear regression and an analytical sample of 12,834, we regressed memory scores at follow-up onto baseline social isolation status, controlling for baseline sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle covariates, baseline memory, and baseline and follow-up functional social support. We further assessed whether functional social support at follow-up mediated the association between baseline social isolation and follow-up memory. To assess moderated mediation, each path of the mediation analysis was stratified by age group and sex \nThe independent and direct effect of social isolation on memory controlling for covariates showed a non-statistically significant, inverse association. Social isolation predicted lower levels of functional social support, whereas high functional social support was associated with higher memory scores. Memory scores decreased on average by 0.03 points in socially isolated participants versus non-isolated participants, when mediated by functional social support. Lastly, some evidence of effect modification was found by the oldest age group on the “a” path of the mediation analysis. \nThis thesis provides novel findings on the mediating effect of functional social support on the relationship between social isolation and memory. Our findings suggest the association between social isolation and memory operates through, not independently of, functional social support. Health professionals working with socially isolated individuals at risk of, or experiencing, memory problems should pay particular attention to these individuals' levels of functional social support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".