MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026810370

Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education

2016· article· en· W7026810370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJINR Document Server (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityContext (archaeology)Relation (database)ConscienceContinuing education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of spirituality is increas-ingly being used in the context of adult education. This paper will tentatively explore some of the implications of an emergent spiri-tuality within the practice of adult education. It begins by situating our understanding of spirituality in an historical context. This is followed by a brief historical overview of the relationship between spirituality, social change, and the practice of adult education. Building on this brief historical analysis, our under-standing of an emergent spirituality is argued to be a property of the evolution of human consciousness. The implications of an emergent spirituality for the practice of adult education are then examined. RÉSUMÉ L’idée de spiritualité est utilisée de plus en plus dans le contexte de l’éducation des adultes. Cet article tentera d’explorer quelques-unes des implications d’une spiritualité émergente à l’intérieur de la pra-tique de l’éducation des adultes. D’abord, l’auteur situe notre com-préhension de spiritualité dans un contexte historique. Ensuite se trouve un bref aperçu historique de la relation entre la spiritualité, le changement social, et la pratique de l’éducation des adultes. En bâtissant sur cette brève analyse historique, il est avancé que notre compréhension de la spiritualité émergente est une caractéristique de l’évolution de la conscience humaine. Par la suite, l’auteur examine les implications d’une spiri-tualité émergente pour la pratique de l’éducation des adultes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gptInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
grokInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
opusInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3980.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 3 models reading the full record.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJINR Document Server (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdult and Continuing Education TopicsCategoryInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)French-language works237,207