MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026814792

Balanced and Restored Cross-Sections Representing Post-Miocene Crustal Extension of Fluvial Deposits, North-Central Montana to Southeast Idaho

2014· article· en· W7026814792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Montana
KeywordsFluvialBedrockTectonicsRiver terracesProvenancePlateau (mathematics)Extensional definitionFault (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research is part of a larger project based on the theory of the existence of a pre-ice age, Amazon-scale river that had headwaters in the southern Colorado Plateau and flowed north through the western United States and Canada before discharging into the Labrador Sea. Stream-rounded fluvial deposits in Montana and Idaho provide evidence of sediment provenance in Nevada and Utah, as there are no confirmed bedrock sources for these sediments in Montana or Idaho. The Miocene river bed has been offset and tilted by dozens of extensional faults in the region. Some faults bound large mountain ranges including the Lost River, Lemhi, Beaverhead, Tendoy, Blacktail Deer, Ruby, Madison, and Big Belt Mountains. The reconstructed trend of the Miocene river bed provides a reference line against which to measure active faulting. We constructed five balanced cross-sections of the deformed subsurface along the Miocene river bed from north-central Montana to southeast Idaho across the faulted mountain ranges and restored the cross-sections to represent an un-deformed subsurface. This provided valuable insight into crustal deformation in these regions. Knowing the timing and extent of crustal deformation has many scientific and societal benefits. Western Montana and adjacent Idaho occupy the Inter-mountain Seismic Zone and have the potential for large earthquakes. Detailed cross-sections through this zone can provide information for development projects in faulted areas, and target potential aquifer locations where the thick river gravel has been down-faulted into the sub-surface. This research will be an important contribution to understanding the evolution of the tectonic landscape of Montana and Idaho.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207