MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026824080

Alternative mechanisms to generate short CDPCux isoforms in cancer cells

2003· dissertation· en· W7026824080 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
KeywordsDNAGene isoformTranscription factorPromoterCell cycleDNA-binding proteinTranscription (linguistics)Gene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CDP/Cux is a transcription factor involved in the control of cellular differentiation and proliferation. It contains four DNA binding domains, three Cut Repeats (CR) and a Cut homeodomain (HD). The full-length p200 protein makes an unstable interaction with DNA via CR1CR2 and is responsible for the CCAAT displacement activity of CDP/Cux. A more stable DNA binding activity could also be detected. This particular activity increased as cells progress from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle following two events. One event is the dephosphorylation of CR3HD by the by the cdc25A phosphatase. The other event involves the proteolytic processing of the full length CDP/Cux protein into a p110 isoform. At the transcriptional level, the p110 protein is able to repress the P21waf1/ Cip1 gene promoter and to activate the DNA polymerase alpha gene promoter as well as other S phase specific genes. In human uterine leiomyomas, an increase in the steady state levels of p110 was observed compared to the normal surrounding myometrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207