MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026849055

Arctic warming: effects on lakes near Resolute Bay, Nunavut, Canada.

2013· other· en· W7026849055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionTSG101Gestational periodHyporeflexiaProteogenomicsArticular cartilage damage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The average annual air temperature at Resolute Bay is cold (-16.4˚C), but summers are getting warmer. Year 2011 provided an extreme example: 37 days during June, July, and August had temperatures that exceeded 10˚C, with an all-time recorded high of 18.7˚C on July 9th. The warm temperatures extended to local lakes. Ice break-up occurred during the first two weeks of July, and water temperatures peaked soon thereafter – exceeding 10˚C in all lakes measured. Shallow lakes were isothermal, and deep lakes exhibited thermal stratification for a brief period. To put these observations into perspective, during 1969-1972 only 15 days during June, July, and August (avg. per year) had air temperatures that exceeded 10˚C, ice break-up occurred during late July or mid-August or not at all, and water temperatures rarely exceeded 4˚C [Schindler et al. 1974 J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31:585-607]. The physical environments of these lakes are thus being pushed by climate warming into new steady states (from amictic or monomictic to polymictic or dimictic). We have begun research to understand resulting effects on lake chemistry and biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))French-language works237,207