Atypical sexual experiences in male children and youth, a retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Survey data was collected toward examining atypical sexual experiences of male children and youth. The Sexual Experiences and Perceptions Questionnaire (SEP-Q) and the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) were administered to a sample of 279 male students from a university population in British Columbia, Canada. Subjects were recruited from a first year psychology course and through advertisements placed on campus. Childhood and adolescent sexual experiences information provided by subjects was differentiated using five categories of age or authority based definition criteria. Self-reported perceptions and measures of trauma were compared using descriptive cross tabulations toward answering several questions about symptomology and perceptions of males reporting these experiences. The results for the different age and sexual behavior categories were represented within tables. Comparisons were noted regarding the affective perceptions of subjects to childhood sexual experiences with significantly older or authority positioned partners in relation to the gender of the sexual partner, the age difference between the subject and partner, the level of manipulation involved in the sexual encounter, whether or not the subject previously disclosed the sexual encounter, the subject's perception of abuse, and assessment of traumatic symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".