MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7026946183

Attitude determination and control for the Self Contained Orbit Termination Tool (SCOTT)

2023· dissertation· en· W7026946183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Representation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpacecraftOrbit (dynamics)SatelliteMagnetometerParticle swarm optimizationControl theory (sociology)Space debrisPower (physics)Control system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents the development of a guidance and control system for a Self-Contained Orbit Determination Tool (SCOTT). SCOTT is designed to provide CubeSats with the capability to autonomously deorbit to meet the 25-year deorbiting guideline set by the United Nations Committee On the Peaceful Use of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS), as a means to mitigating the growing space debris problem. The SCOTT module is equipped with Sun sensors, magnetometer, gyroscope, and thrusters. This use of low-cost, simple sensors provides an autonomous, self-contained solution that does not require communication with spacecraft operators or other satellites. SCOTT's guidance system measures the Sun and magnetic field vectors over an orbit and uses the angle between the two measured vectors to determine the retrograde direction through a particle swarm optimization algorithm and a power spectral density analysis. SCOTT's control strategy consists of pointing the spacecraft's deorbit thrusters in the retrograde direction by controlling to prescribed Sun sensor and magnetometer measurements. The prescribed measurements represent the sensor readings that would be collected if the spacecraft was pointed in the correct direction for a retrograde burn. Using simulation, I developed an integrated guidance and control operational procedure that is able to self-assess its own optimization solution and autonomously carry out a deorbit maneuver. The results show that SCOTT is successfully able to determine its position, and perform a deorbit burn that maneuvers the spacecraft into a lower orbit that accelerates deorbit and ensures conformance to the deorbiting guideline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it