MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027119609

Cardiovascular and myotropic actions of bradykinin and angiotensin II in the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea

2011· dissertation· en· W7027119609 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSkateBradykininVasodilationAngiotensin IIHeterologousMesenteric arteriesRenin–angiotensin system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the actions of bradykinin (BK) and angiotensin II (ANG II), the kallikrein-kinin and renin-angiotensin systems, respectively, regulate cardiovascular mechanisms in both mammals and fish. The myotropic and cardiovascular actions of homologous BK from the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea, were examined in the little skate. Administration of skate BK in vivo produced a biphasic increase in blood pressure and constricted the 1st branchial, mesenteric and celiac arteries in vitro. Co-administration of skate BK with several pharmacological agents suggest multiple pathways are involved in mediating the myoactivity of the BK in the little skate. The myotropic effects of ANG peptides were also assessed in the little skate and addition of homologous ANG II to pre-constricted vessels in vitro demonstrated a dose-dependent vasodilation. Morover, addition of skate BK in a heterologous bioassay produced a dose-dependent vasodilator effect in the aorta of the mouse suggesting conservation of this ancient peptide-receptor complex in mammals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema→French-language works237,207→