Autoriteater ja kollektiivne autorlus ning nendest lähtuv enda praktilise loomingu analüüs, ehk, Autoriteater ja kollektiivne loomemeetod praktikas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Käesoleva kirjaliku lõputöö eesmärk on uurida Eestis järjest enam aktuaalsemaks muutuvat nähtust „Autoriteater“. Leides vastuseid küsimustele nagu „Kes seda viljelevad?“ „Mis asi see üldse on,“ „Kas Autoriteater on üldse päriselt olemas?“ „ Millised on Autoriteatri tegemise telgitagused?“ proovib töö autor avada Autoriteatri olemust. Vastuseid nendele ja veel mitmele küsimusele proovib autor leida läbi asjaosaliste arvamuste kui ka läbi enda praktilise kogemuse. \nTeine pool tööst uurib autoriteatri töövormi „kollektiivne loomemeetod“ . Ehk siis seda osa autoriteatrist, kus autoriks on kogu trupp. Selle loomeetodi olemuse avamiseks uurib autor nii teooriat kui ka enda praktilist kogemust lavastajana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it