MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027200738

Cossacks’ Function in Russia’s Colonization of North Caucasus in 18thand 19thCentury

2013· article· en· W7027200738 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCybernetics and Technology in Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)Ethnic groupColonizationFunction (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the second quarter of 18th. Century Russia began to show it’s attention theNorthern Caucasus developing more structured policies. The slavization andchristianization of the Caucasus is at the begining of these planned politicalmoves. According to this plan, as well as Russian peasants to farm and peoplesfrom different ethnic origin were settled in this area. This settlement policy hasbeen applied especially along the Mozdok-Azov line. This constituted themajority of the people in the muzhiks and the Cossacks. Cossacks, with warriorfeatures, brought by force from different sectors were used as a very functionalinstrument in Caucasus policies of Russia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicCybernetics and Technology in SocietyFrench-language works237,207