MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027246576

CCSDS Guide for Secure System Interconnection - CCSDS 350.4-G-1

2007· article· en· W7027246576 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyNational Commission for Science and TechnologyIran Telecommunication Research CenterEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesKorea Aerospace Research InstituteU.S. Geological SurveyIndian Space Research OrganisationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Space OrganizationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeChinese Academy of SciencesCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsData systemKey (lock)Information systemSpace (punctuation)Data securityInterconnectionReliability (semiconductor)StandardizationData integrityAgency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This CCSDS Informational Report is an adaptation of United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Security Guide for Interconnecting Information Technology Systems (NIST Special Publication 800-47). The CCSDS Report is tailored for the space community and provides a guide for secure space agency interconnections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1610.165

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207