Círculo hermenêutico-dialético como sequência didática interativa.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo é um desdobramento da Metodologia Interativa, que foi construída durante o processo de elaboração de uma tese de doutorado na Universidade de Sherbrooke (US) – Quebec-Canadá, cuja temática foi analisar um projeto bilateral Brasil-Canadá. Com base nesta metodologia desenvolvemos uma ferramenta didática que denominamos Sequência Didática Interativa (SDI). Neste trabalho, apresentamos o resultado de duas experiências com aplicação da SDI, sendo a primeira em uma universidade pública, e outra, em uma faculdade da rede particular de ensino. Pelos resultados obtidos, é possível afirmar que a utilização do CHD, por meio de uma sequência didática interativa, facilita a dialogicidade e criatividade na produção de um novo conhecimento.Résumé: Cet article est un déploiement de la Méthodologie Interactive qui fut construite pendant le processus d’élaboration d’une thèse de doctorat à l’Université de Sherbrooke – Québec, Canada, dont la thématique fut d’analyser un projet bilatéral Brésil-Canada. Partant de la base de cette méthodologie, nous avons mis au point un outil didactique que nous dénominons Séquence Didactique Interactive (SDI). Dans ce travail, nous présentons le résultat de deux expériences, la première dans une université publique et l’autre dans une faculté privée d’enseignement à Recife, PE. D’après les résultats obtenus, il est possible d’affirmer que l’utilisation de la SDI, dans le processus d’apprentissage facilite le fait de dialoguer et la créativité dans la production d’une nouvelle connaissance.Mots-clés: méthodologie interactive; outil didactique; séquence didactique interactive.Abstract: A this paper is an offshoot of the Interactive Methodology, which was built during the process of preparing a doctorate thesis at the University of Sherbrooke (U.S.) – Quebec-Canada, whose theme was to analyze a bilateral project Brazil-Canada. Based on this methodology, we developed a teaching tool named Interactive Teaching Sequence (ITS). In this work, we present the results of two experiments, the first in a public university and the other in a college of private schools in Recife. By the results, it is possible to state that the use of ITS, in the teaching-learning process facilitates the dialog and creativity in producing a new knowledge.Keywords: interactive methodology; teaching too; interactive teaching sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".