Circulaire-programme de la societe d'hygiene de la province de Quebec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
united net ion of all parts of the Empire, will be better understood, while the necessity for some form of Imperial Federation will become more generally appreciated.1:2.It is most desirable by all and every means to encourage the formation of sound public opinion on so important a question.This may be done, for example, by organising public meetings, by lectures, and by discussions in parliament and in the press, etc, etc.The General Committee will, on application, be happy to assist as far as possible any efforts in these directions made by Branches.When the League is fully organised, and sufficient funds, properly available for the purpose, are at the disposal of the General Committee, arrangements will be made for public meetings when and where desirable, and for securing the services of properly qualified persons to deliver lectures when required.13.The annual registration fees of members will be payable on the 1st of January in each year.Annual registration fees paid before the 1st of January, 1885, will be considered as paid for the whole year 1885.N.B.-It is to be observed by all members of the League, and by all sympathisers with the movement, that the " annual registration fee " has been fixed at the small sum of one shilling, so as to admit of all classes of the community joining the League.The Imperial Federation League, therefore, relies on voluntary aid.Although the General Committee only require the " annual registration fees 't to be sent from Branches, still, considering the heavy expenditure which will have to be incurred in carry- ing out the objects of the League, they will thank- fully receive contributions from the Branches as well as from private individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.167 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".