Characterization of Abuse Properties of the Anesthetic Propofol Using the Self-administration Paradigm in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Propofol is a widely in use anesthetic drug. Propofolâs abuse liability has been supported by many case reports and a few animal studies. However, propofolâs reinforcing properties have not yet been investigated in-depth. In this study, multiple aspects of propofolâs abuse-related behaviour were investigated using the drug self-administration model in rats. METHODS: Rats were subjected to propofol self-administration under a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule and different aspects of propofol self-administration behaviour including acquisition, maintenance of the behaviour under a higher ratio schedule, extinction and reinstatement were investigated. RESULTS: Rats acquired propofol self-administration under a FR1 schedule. The acquired behaviour was maintained under a FR2 schedule, showed a modest variation over a range of doses, and was extinguished upon substitution of vehicle for propofol, showing no reinstatement using a range of priming doses of propofol. CONCLUSION: Propofol has abuse potential showing modest reinforcing properties under our experimental conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".