MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027368923

Characterizing Trends in the Dietary Patterns of Canadians: Evidence from Two Cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey—Nutrition

2019· dissertation· W7027368923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsObesityOddsCommunity healthPublic healthAssociation (psychology)Odds ratioNutritional epidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthy dietary patterns have been associated with reduced risk of non-communicable diseases. The overall goals of this thesis were to examine adherence to healthy dietary patterns using nationally-representative Canadian data and to determine the association between these trends and obesity among Canadian adults. In the first study, the likelihood of being obese was compared between samples from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition (CCHS) 2004 and CCHS 2015; results suggested that Canadian adults who did not adhere to a healthy dietary pattern had over 2x greater odds of obesity than those who did adhere. In the second study, an energy-dense, low-fiber and high fat dietary pattern was identified in CCHS 2015; results suggest key foods to focus on in policy which contribute to an “obesogenic” dietary pattern. The findings presented in this thesis highlight the importance of examining healthy dietary patterns and their association with health outcomes among the Canadian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.013
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→