The clinic: paradigm shifts in urban design and stigma free healthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines the link between architecture and queer spaces, exploring how standardized clinical facilities can be transgressed and queered to suit the needs of a comunity largely left out of normative healthcare. 2SLGTBQ co, mmunities2SLGBTQ people cannot be defined by their physical attributes; therefore the community is often left to be defined by the spaces they frequent. Queer people have appropriated spaces, and negotiated social structures to fulfil their needs as individuals as well as members of a wider queer community. The thesis examines the history of queer people and the village in Toronto, Ontario through a lense focusing on healthcare and wellbeing. The Toronto Church and Wellesley Village has been the site of raids, protests, rallies, stigmatization, and prejudice. Murals are celebrated and cover old and new structures in the village depicting the controversial past and mark the importance of these events to the development of queer Toronto. Expanding on these murals, and drawing on their history, intentions and design this thesis proposal proposes a queer architecture and urban complex
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.106 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".