MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027382000

Canadian Reaction on International Accounts: to the Inflow of Foreign Capital in the Period 1956-1962

2016· article· en· W7027382000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExchange rateLiberian dollarCapital outflowForeign exchangeForeign capitalStimulus (psychology)Capital (architecture)InflowFixed exchange rates
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the post-World war II period, the Canadian economy operated under the stimulus and pressure of heavy inflows of foreign capital.In September, 19?0, the Canadian Government freed the exchange rate of t.he Canadian dollar leaving the long-run determination of the exchange rate to market forces.In May, 1962, Canada abandoned the free rate and re-established a fixed exchange rate.The pertinent questions th~s arise of why, after eleven years, Canada abandoned a flexible rate and re-established a fixed exchange rate, what were the effects of the heavy inflows of foreign capital during this period, and what was the role of monetary and fiscal policy?To make this study, it was necessary to collect data on the Canadian international accounts and domestic economy in the period, 1956-1962.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.019
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207