Consumers’ perception of amaranth in Mexico: A traditional food with characteristics of functional foods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the market of functional foods has grown mainly in developed countries.The Asian-Pacific region, the USA, Canada and Europe consume 78 per cent of total sales(Vicentini et al., 2016). This growth is due to demographic changes as the increase of lifeexpectancy that generates consumers more aware of their health, incorporating in their dietsnew foods that promise to improve and prolong their quality of life (Vecchio et al., 2016).This phenomenon has influenced other emergent markets like Mexico and Brazil that arethe highest consumers of functional foods in Latina America (Vicentini et al., 2016). In Mexicoas in other countries, the economic development, and demographic and socio-cultural changeshave also promoted modification of lifestyles in different social strata of the population(Espinoza-Ortega et al., 2016). A negative effect of these changes is reflected in the highincidence of diabetes (9.5 per cent) and high overweight in more than 70 per cent of adults(INSP, 2016). From this, Mexican consumers seem to be willing to incorporate foods
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it