MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027416425

The connection between Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the forest fires in Manitoba Province (Canada)

2023· article· en· W7027416425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Archive of SASA (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOral and Craniofacial Lesions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSouthern oscillationThe arcticArcticPeriod (music)Arctic oscillation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A downward trend of the annual number of forest fires and upward trends of the annual burned area and the average burned area per fire were recorded in Manitoba in the period 1970-2014. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) was used in the research of the connection between Arctic oscillation (AO) and forest fires. The values of R significant at p≤0.01 were recorded for the annual burned area and summer AO (0.425) and July AO (0.402), as well as for the average burned area per fire and summer AO (0.445).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Archive of SASA (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)Same topicOral and Craniofacial LesionsFrench-language works237,207