Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the beginning of the XXI century, it was of interest to strengthen the centrifugal nature of urban processes, called suburbanization. As a follow-up process, the development of suburbanization is related to urban growth and population growth. Developments in Western Europe largely follow the patterns of suburbanization of countries overseas (the US and Canada), with over 70-80% of the population living in the suburbs or outskirts of cities. In Europe, it is difficult to define suburbanization processes due to the fact that in different countries there is a different definition of urban areas, agglomerations, urbanized areas, and other socio-economic structures. On the territory of Bulgaria, the processes of suburbanization began to develop after the 1950 s and followed those of the countries of Eastern Europe. The territory and area of the country concerned are essential. The collection of information on suburbanization as an ongoing process is carried out by the UN and Eurostat statistical offices. The information provided by each country in Europe is different in the context of the above lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it