Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce livre entend combler une lacune, celle de la méconnaissance de la contre-culture au Québec, un phénomène majeur qui, au cours d’une décennie particulièrement effervescente, a traîné dans son sillage des milliers de jeunes gens que l’extrême gauche ou le néonationalisme – des courants rivaux, si l’on peut dire – n’attiraient pas. Assez étrangement, peu d’études existent sur ce mouvement, sa sensibilité particulière et ses manifestations symboliques, d’où l’intérêt de cet ouvrage qui vise précisément à dresser le panorama de ses artistes et de leurs productions les plus marquantes, de l’Infonie au Jazz libre du Québec, en passant par Victor Lévy-Beaulieu, Josée Yvon, Mainmise ou le Front de libération homosexuel. À partir de la contribution de spécialistes de divers domaines – musique, littérature, théâtre, cinéma, art visuel, sociologie –, le livre fait le point sur ce vent de contestation qui a balayé l’Amérique des années 1960 et 1970 et sur ce qu’il a semé dans un Québec « hors de la carte », selon les mots de Raôul Duguay, l’un des plus célèbres représentants de la mouvance québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".