MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7027620233

Deep Grey Matter Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Very Preterm Children

2013· dissertation· en· W7027620233 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsGrey matterWhite matterNeuropsychologyNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingBrain sizeCognitionThalamus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Definition of neurodevelopmental outcome from early brain imaging remains a priority for survivors of very preterm (VPT) birth given their persistently high rates of cognitive and motor difficulties. Volumes of the deep grey matter (DGM) structures were measured longitudinally using magnetic resonance imaging from 96 VPT infants studied within 2 weeks of birth and 70 at term-equivalent age. At 4 years of age, 36 children returned for neuropsychological assessments evaluating IQ, language function, and visual motor integration. Multiple hierarchical regressions examined associations of DGM growth with neuropsychological measures. Overall DGM growth, primarily attributed to the caudate and thalamus, predicted Full Scale IQ, core language and VMI scores after controlling for sex and total brain volume. Thalamic growth was additionally associated with measures of neonatal clinical severity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and white matter lesions. Longitudinal growth of the DGM, particularly the caudate and thalamus were established as early markers of long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicInfant Development and Preterm Care→French-language works237,207→