Design for AM & metal AM processes: Presentation held at Additive Manufacturing Workshop with McGill University and Fraunhofer Additive Manufacturing Alliance, September 29, 2017, Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additive Manufacturing (AM), often simply called as 3D printing, provides unforeseen freedom to design parts with integrated functionalities and optimized performances. It has tremendous potentials for industries such as aerospace industry and medical device manufacturers to develop innovative and high value-added products. This workshop invites Canadian industries to learn the AM research activities at Fraunhofer Additive Manfuacturing Alliance in Germany. Design for AM, Laser beam Melting (LBM) and Electron Beam Melting (EBM) processes will be the focus of this workshop. Current R&D topics on LBM and EBM such as materials and application examples will be presented. Cutting edge industrial applications and trends associated with design for AM and limitations related to current AM technologies will also be discussed. This workshop is a free event. However, due to limited seating capacity for this workshop, advanced registration is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".