MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027665501

THE CONSTRUCTION OF OPERATIONAL RESSOURCES CONTRIBUTION TO TRAINING CONDITIONS DESIGN IN THE WORKPLACE

2001· other· fr· W7027665501 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2001
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Technology and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LES < > (RESOP) CONSTRUITES PAR LES TRAVAILLEURS JOUENT UN ROLE CRITIQUE DANS LA CONSTRUCTION DES SAVOIRS PROFESSIONNELS EN SITUATION DE TRAVAIL ET LE CONTEXTE, LA MARGE DE MANOEUVRE ET LES RESSOURCES ALLOUEES PAR L'ENTREPRISE INFLUENCENT LES POTENTIALITES DE CONSTRUCTION, LEURS APPORTS ET LIMITES, LES BENEFICES ET COUTS HUMAINS INDIVIDUELS ET COLLECTIFS. CES RESULTATS PROVIENNENT D'UNE ANALYSE DE SITUATIONS DE TRAVAIL DIFFERENTES QUANT A LA PRODUCTION, L'ORGANISATION DU TRAVAIL ET LE DISPOSITIF DE FORMATION: UNE ENTREPRISE DE TRANSFORMATION DE LA VIANDE (SECTEUR INDUSTRIEL QUEBECOIS) EN PROCESSUS D'IMPLANTATION D'UNE FORMATION; L'AUTRE DE GESTION DES EAUX (SECTEUR DE SERVICES FRANCAIS). EN SITUATION TRES CONTRAINTE, LES ELEMENTS DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT POUVANT ETRE SOURCES DE RESSOURCES SONT LIMITES ET LES STRATEGIES DE CONSTRUCTION DES RESOP PLUS COUTEUSES QUE DANS L'AUTRE SITUATION. MAIS LA COMBINAISON DE RESOP CONSTRUITES (ORGANISATIONNELLES, MATERIELLES ET RELATIONNELLES) ET LES STRATEGIES DE CONSTRUCTION DE CES RESSOURCES EST LA MEME (DECOUVERTE, EXPERIMENTATION, TRANSFORMATION, CREATION, ABANDON; MOMENTS DIVERS INCLUANT DE VIE PRIVEE). LE POIDS DE CHACUNE DIFFERE TOUTEFOIS; LES RESOP TEMPORELLES ET SPATIALES, PUIS RELATIONNELLES CONSTITUENT SOUVENT DES CLES D'ACCES AUX RESOP MATERIELLES ET A DE NOUVELLES STRATEGIES. LA PREMIERE PARTIE DE LA THESE INTRODUIT LE CONTEXTE DE L'ETUDE ET LES CADRES THEORIQUE ET METHODOLOGIQUE QUI S'APPUIENT SUR L'ERGONOMIE DE TYPE < > ET RECHERCHE-ACTION, ET SUR DES DISCIPLINES INTERESSEES PAR L'APPRENTISSAGE < >. LES APPORTS SONT DISCUTES SOUS L'ANGLE DE LA RELATION ENTRE CONTEXTE ET SAVOIRS, PROCESSUS, RESSOURCES, STRATEGIES ET ACTIVITES IMPLIQUES (EN PARTICULIER METAFONCTIONNELLES). LA SECONDE PARTIE EST CONSACREE AUX RESULTATS (PORTRAIT DES POPULATIONS ET SITUATIONS ETUDIEES; STRATEGIES DE CONSTRUCTION DES RESOP; APPORT DE LA FORMATION FORMELLE DANS L'ENTREPRISE DU SECTEUR INDUSTRIEL). LES CONCLUSIONS PORTENT SUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT D'UNE APPROCHE ERGONOMIQUE DE LA FORMATION EN SITUATION DE TRAVAIL; D'UN OUTIL D'ANALYSE DES CONDITIONS D'APPRENTISSAGE QUI FONT OBSTACLE A LA CONSTRUCTION DES SAVOIRS; DE REPERES POUR LA CONCEPTION DES SITUATIONS DE FORMATION.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicInformation Technology and LearningFrench-language works237,207