MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027729425

The Current State of the Commercial Real Estate Office Sector

2023· dissertation· en· W7027729425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateWorkforceWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)ProductivityTelecommutingFront office
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In January 2023, approximately 50% of Manhattan office workers were in the office on an average weekday; roughly 10% of the local workforce was fully remote; and only 9% of employees were in the office five days a week. These city-level trends are also reflected at the submarket, market, and national levels. As of 2023, 13% of full-time U.S employees work entirely from home, while 28% work a hybrid model. The Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on commercial real estate, particularly the office sector, is still being felt three years later. Due to the 2020 outbreak of the coronavirus, regulators worldwide implemented lockdowns, forcing employees to work remotely indefinitely. And to the surprise of many, this trend has continued unabated.
\n
\nThe adaptation of the work-from-home model by a myriad of office real estate tenants caused a significant decline in office space demand. According to commercial real estate services firm, CBRE, the U.S. national office market reported 16.5 million sq. ft. of negative net absorption in Q1 2023 (the weakest quarter for office demand in two years), bringing overall vacancy up to 17.8%. The concept of remote working has long been criticized and rejected. The prevailing belief was that employees are simply not as motivated nor productive working from home as opposed to the office. Additionally, critics further argue that it is impossible to build and maintain a company office culture if your employees are not physically present in the office. Simply put: the remote work model was widely regarded and portrayed as a productivity and culture “killer”. The temporary lockdowns in 2020 however presented a unique (and forced) opportunity for those theories to be tested. Three years later, it’s safe to say that the paradigm of traditional workspaces has undergone a seismic shift thanks to the Covid-19 pandemic. The remote-work model's benefits and limitations have largely come to light, prompting employers and employees to respond accordingly.
\n
\nWith an increasing number of companies cutting down their real estate footprints, rising vacancy rates, and plummeting valuations, what exactly does the future hold for the office sector? How are investors, landlords, and tenants affected? These are some of the questions that I look to address throughout this paper, for which I’ve interviewed three highly regarded and respected industry experts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it