MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027735584

Desplazamiento subsidiario: efectos de gentrificación contemporánea en barrios céntricos en reconstrucción post-terremoto. El caso de Talca, Chile

2017· article· en· W7027735584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)GentrificationPublic housingSubsidyMetropolitan areaQuarter (Canadian coin)Scale (ratio)Displacement (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of gentrification including the displacement of social classes of workers has been widely studied in metropolitan cities, initially of the Anglo-Saxon world. However, fewer studies have focused on cities of intermediate scale and other latitudes affected by catastrophic natural events, such as earthquakes. The paper explores the process of reconstruction of the Northen Quarter of Talca, Chile, after the earthquake of February 27, 2010. An exploratory-descriptive approach is adopted that analyzes the types of housing subsidies delivered by the Chilean State and its effects in both the neighborhood morphology and the perception of its original and new residents. As a result, it is argued that the reconstruction of Talca has generated the displacement of low-income owners families, from this central area to new social housing units located in the periphery of the city, coined under the concept of subsidiary displacement. The paper reflects in the need of a deep revision of the state policy of reconstruction that, above all, protects the socio-spatial fabric of historic neighborhoods and avoids a process of gentrification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207