MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027838801

Diagnostic approfondi du génie civil du réservoir sur tour de Bois Bourgeot

2021· dissertation· fr· W7027838801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital and Cyber Forensics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrithNova scotiaTime lag
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suite à l’effondrement d’une partie de l’isolation thermique extérieure du réservoir de Bois Bourgeot, le SIAEP de Decize – Saint-Léger-des-Vignes – Champvert a souhaité engager un diagnostic approfondi de son réservoir. Cette étude s’appuie sur une méthodologie stricte de diagnostic d’ouvrage reposant sur une compilation des données existantes, une couverture photographique et un examen visuel détaillé, permettant de relever, d’identifier et de prioriser les désordres selon la méthode du CEMAGREF. La mise en œuvre de cette méthodologie a permis de mettre en avant les différents désordres du réservoir et de conclure sur des préconisations de travaux de réhabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicDigital and Cyber ForensicsFrench-language works237,207