MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027846729

37. Cumhuriyet Hükümetinin (CHP-MSP Koalisyonu) dış politikası 26 Ocak-17 Kasım 1974

2009· other· tr· W7027846729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2009
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSocial Policies and Healthcare Reform
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamJeremy benthamQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

37.Hükümet (26 Ocak –17 Kasım 1974) Türkiye’de birçok iç ve dış sorunun arka arkaya gediği bir dönemde kurulmuştur. Bu dönemin Türk dış politikasında son derece önemli, uzun yıllar etkisini gösterecek birçok gelişme yaşanmıştır. En önemlileri Yunanistan’la yaşanan Ege Denizi’ne ilişkin sorunlar ve Kıbrıs meselesidir. 15 Temmuz 1974 tarihinde Kıbrıs’ta yaşanan Sampson darbesi Ada’daki Türk varlığını tehdit etmiştir. 37.Hükümet’in karar verdiği 20 Temmuz 1974’te düzenlen Kıbrıs Harekâtı’ndan sonra Ada’nın bir kısmının Türk hâkimiyetine geçmesi ve Ada’nın fiilen bölünmesi durumunu yaratmıştır. \n37.Hükümet’in Kıbrıs’ta başlattığı Barış Harekâtı, BM Güvenlik Konseyi ve NATO’da dikkatle izlenmiş ve konuyla ilgili birçok karar alınmıştır.37.Hükümet alınan bu kararları ciddiyetle takip etmiş ancak bu kararları kendisine yönelik bir baskı aracı olarak düşünmeden kendi dış politikasını yürütmeye devam etmiştir.\n37.Hükümet dönemi Türk-Amerikan ilişkileri, Haşhaş sorunuyla yeni bir boyut kazanmaya başlamıştır. ABD Yönetimi ve kamuoyunda, Türkiye’nin haşhaş ekimine izin vermesi oldukça büyük bir tepkiyle karşılanmıştır. ABD Yönetimi Türkiye’nin Birinci Barış Harekâtı’nda tarafsız, Türk-Yunan savaşını önlemeye yönelik yapıcı bir politika izlerken özellikle ABD Temsilciler Meclisi, İkinci Barış Harekâtı’na tepki göstermiştir. Ayrıca, bu dönemde ABD Temsilciler Meclisi ve Senatosu’nun, Kıbrıs’ta Amerikan silahları kullanıldığı gerekçesiyle hazırladıkları silah ambargosu yasa tasarıları Türk ABD ilişkilerinde son derece gergin ve kötü bir dönemin başlangıcı olmuştur. \n37.Hükümet dönemi Türk-İngiliz ilişkileri ise pek olumlu olmayan bir süreç yaşamıştır. Kıbrıs sorunu karşısında Türkiye’nin ortak müdahale önerisini reddeden İngiltere gelişmelere yeterli tepkiyi göstermemiştir. Sorunla ilgili tüm müzakerelerde çoğunlukla Yunanistan lehine olacak çözüm yollarını destekleyerek, arabuluculuk rolü üstlenmiştir.\n37.Hükümet dönemi Türk-Sovyet ilişkileri Kıbrıs’ta yaşanan kriz hakkındaki düşüncelerin benzer olması nedeniyle başlangıçta uyumlu olmuştur. Türkiye’nin Ada’ya müdahalesinden sonra sorunun kesin çözümüne ilişkin Türkiye ve Sovyetlerin görüşlerinin belirgin bir farklılık göstermesi karşısında başlangıçtaki uyum bozulsa da sorun denebilecek düzeye ulaşmamıştır.\n\nAnahtar sözcükler:\n1. 37.Cumhuriyet Hükümeti\n2. I.Ecevit Hükümeti\n3. Türk Dış Politikası\n4. Kıbrıs sorunu\n 5. Karasuları Sorunu\n 6. Haşhaş Sorunu\n ABSTRACT\n37th Turkish Government was established (January the 26th - November the 17th in 1974) in a period when lots of national and international problems were rising one after another. In this period lots of process which had great important and profound effects for years were took place in the foreign affairs of Turkey. The most important of them were the problems with Greece about the Aegean Region and the Cyprus problem. The Coup d'état on 15 July in 1974 in Cyprus, threatened the Turkish presence in the Cyprus Island. After the Peace Operation on which the 37th Government decided on 20th July in 1974, a part of the island was dominated by the Turks and Cyprus was virtually separated. \nThe peace operations started by 37th Government in Cyprus were monitored by UN Security Council and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and many decrees were taken by them. 37th government took those decrees into consideration but never thought them as compulsion. It went on following its own foreign policies.\nThe relationship between the Turks and the Americans in the 37th Government period started to gain a new dimension with the problem of opium poppy. The allowance of Turkey to grow opium poppy was protested both by the USA government and in the American common opinion. While the American Government was following an impartial policy to prevent Turkish – Greek war in the first peace operation, especially USA Chamber of Deputy reacted against Turkey in the Second Peace Operation. Moreover in this period, the embargo draft bills which was prepared by USA Chamber of deputies and Senate Committee on the ground those American guns were used in Cyprus was the beginning of a tense and undesirable period. \nIn the 37th Government Period, Turkish- English relationship was not that good. For the Cyprus problem, England refused the nomination to intervene for common reaction. And it didn’t give enough reaction for the developments. In all the negotiations England took the role of conciliator supporting for the solutions to the advantage of Greece.\nIn the period of 37th Government, the relationship between Turkey and the Soviet Union was compatible at the beginning as the thoughts were similar about the Cyprus crisis. However, after the military intervention of Turkey, for the exact solution Turkey’s and Soviet Union’s thoughts were not as compatible as it was before. Fortunately it didn’t turn into a problem.\nKeywords\n1.\t37th Turkish Government\n2.\tFirst Government Of Ecevit\n3.\tTurkish Foreign Policy\n4.\tThe Cyprus Problem\n5.\tThe Problem Of Territorial Waters\n6.\tThe Problem Of Opium Poppy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0110.009
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it