Diseño metodológico de una guía de acceso al comercio justo a través del análisis del caso UROCAL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fair Trade was created as an initiative of international cooperation with countries of \nthe North to small farmers in the south, with the aim of helping their communities to \nreduce poverty and exploitation through the creation of supportive relationships. But \nthe global problem, as well as in Ecuador is that small producers are not part of a fair \nchain. In addition, they don´t know other commercial alternative. For this reason this \nresearch, aims to generate a methodological guide and knowledge for small \nproducers to access into Fair Trade, prior to the presentation and analysis of a \nparticular case of our country, which is located in the coastal zone of the provinces of \nOro, Azuay and Guayas, known as UROCAL and the base group NUEVO \nMUNDO, who exports organic and Fair Trade bananas to markets like Germany, the \nU.S. and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it