MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7027898102

Dopady reformy daně z příjmů fyzických osob a odvodů na vybraného poplatníka

2024· other· cs· W7027898102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace VŠB-TUO (VŠB-TUO) · 2024
Typeother
Languagecs
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PopulationPrimary care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bakalářská práce se dělí na část teoretickou a praktickou. Teoretická část se věnuje základním pojmům, jako je daň z příjmů fyzických osob, daňové přiznání a sociální a zdravotní pojistné OSVČ. Ve třetí kapitole je čtenáři představena deskripce změn v konsolidačním balíčku pro rok 2024 se zaměřením na jejich dopad na OSVČ. Kromě teoretických poznatků jsou u každé změny uvedeny také praktické příklady, které jsou porovnány s legislativou z roku 2023. Praktická část se věnuje analýze dopadu konsolidačního balíčku na vybraného poplatníka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace VŠB-TUO (VŠB-TUO)French-language works237,207