Effect of single-walled carbon nanotubes on processing and property enhancement of epoxy adhesives and laminates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the effects of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) on mechanical and electrical properties of two epoxy resins (a high temperature aerospace-grade epoxy and an aerospace-grade adhesive) were evaluated. The performance of these two SWCNT-modified epoxy resins was also studied in their end-use applications, as a matrix for a glass fiber laminate composites and as an adhesive for aluminum-to-aluminum bonding, respectively. The results suggest that the mechanical and electrical property improvements observed in bulk resin due the addition of SWCNTs do not necessarily translate into comparable property enhancements in laminates and joints. It was found that the electrical property improvements of nano-modified laminates exceeded those of bulk SWCNT-modified epoxy. The translation of mechanical properties from bulk resin to the structural level, on the other hand, was found to be less successful. The results are discussed in terms of challenges associated with processing and resin-fiber interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".