Evaluación a la calidad y seguridad en la atención a pacientes del servicio de medicina interna del Hospital Eugenio Espejo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo del presente trabajo de investigación consistió en realizar un análisis de la calidad y seguridad de la atención médica en el Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo de la ciudad de Quito-Ecuador en el servicio de Medicina Interna, a través de un proceso de comparación entre la realidad evidenciada en el servicio objeto de estudio y estándares de calidad nacionales e internacionales de estructura, proceso y resultados, para el efecto de utilizaron tres instrumentos metodológicos como son la observación directa, la evaluación a historias clínicas y la entrevista no estructurada a usuarios internos y externos. Para evaluación de calidad en el presente proyecto de investigación se tomaron como base los estándares establecidos por la Accreditation Canada International (ACI) para evaluar proceso y los estándares de la OPS y la normativa peruana para evaluar estructura y resultados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".