MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028193730

Family values of Russian youth in the context of global systemic changes

2025· article· en· W7028193730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSocioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Value (mathematics)Family valuesValue systemsFamily lifeValue system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of current trends in the socio-political agenda of Russian society aimed at strengthening traditional values, supporting large families and fertility, it seems necessary to analyses the current marriage and family values and reproductive attitudes of modern youth. On the basis of a questionnaire survey of young students, data were obtained on their attitudes towards marriage and family, their desire and intentions to have children, and their preferred family models. This study aims to examine and comprehend the current mood of young people in the family and marriage sphere in the context of the ongoing social policy aimed at improving the demographic situation in the country. The results of the study allow us to conclude that today’s young people are oriented towards creating a family, but the main family value is marriage rather than parenthood. The value of children in the system of life values of young people is not a priority. The attitude towards medium- sized children (two children in the family) was also revealed, but it is alarming that more than a quarter of respondents indicated that the family may be childless.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicSocioeconomic and Demographic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207