El trabajo como relación social una problematización del modo de construcción del objeto a partir de la sociología del salariado de Pierre Naville
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta Tesis Doctoral presenta algunas de las obras e investigaciones de Pierre Naville (1904-1993) en materia de Sociología. Apoyándose en ellas trata de problematizar críticamente el modo de formalización del objeto característico de la Sociología del Trabajo clásica y contemporánea. En la Primera Parte se aborda ésta desde una relectura de algunos de los autores, hitos y escuelas más destacados en los manuales al uso en nuestro país. Estos planteamientos son deconstruidos al hilo de los significados sociolo?gicos de la OCT, la automación, la cualificación y la terciarización del trabajo. En la Segunda Parte estos mismo problemas pasan a reconstruirse a partir las investigaciones de Pierre Naville, primero, para, después, desarrollarse algunos de los principios y modos de operacionalización de los que dicho autor se ha servido. La Tesis se cierra con un intento de exploración crítica de los avances conquistados recientemente por la Sociología del Empleo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".