Exploring the Impact of Social Media on the Religious and Spiritual Beliefs of Emerging Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adoption of social media has been suggested to contribute to a syncretic behavior in emerging adults. The rate of innovation and change that occurred in the church during the Reformation, concurrent with the rise of the printing press, is similar to the rate of cultural change occurring today; a primary missional challenge of the Christian church is to incarnate the gospel in the digital world. While much research has been conducted on the effects of social media in a variety of demographics and its unintended consequences, limited research has examined the impact of social media on the religious and spiritual beliefs of emerging adults in a Canadian context. A qualitative, inductive study of emerging adults explores how social media potentially disrupts, promotes, or interacts with their religious and spiritual belief. The study notes the gap that is created between those who have a hunger for spirituality and an openness to organized religion and faith communities that are viewed as neither resource or environment for questioning and exploration. In this study, all participants connectedness through social media emboldened their healthy questioning and critical understandings which, in turn, impacted their worldview. The study notes that theology is no longer centralized but rather generated in a co-operative way and the importance for faith communities to create, or recreate, an environment akin to a medieval village green. This will provide some context for Canadian faith communities to think through how to shift behaviors to deal appropriately with social media and online interaction while tending to the spiritual and religious needs of their people in addition to helping said faith communities navigate how to apply traditional rules to new technologies. The study outcomes are expected to contribute to the field of pastoral leadership by adding to the developing conversation about our changing contexts and how faith communities might engage a particular and vital demographic amidst rapid social and technological change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".