MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028237307

ELASTICOFarm : Esplorare Errando. Una conversazione con Stefano Pujatti = Errant exploration. A conversation with Stefano Pujatti

2021· article· it· W7028237307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAirIuav (Università Iuav di Venezia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureStudioReading (process)Conversation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[IT] \nAlcuni autori, molto più di altri, richiedono fatica nell'essere compresi, in quanto necessitano una lettura che deve considerare, nel loro insieme e nella loro contraddizione, le regole “intrinseche” che costituiscono il fare architettura in Italia. Sono dettami legati alla burocrazia, all'economia, ai vincoli, alla committenza e alle necessità appartenenti alla quotidianità e che ogni ufficio di architettura affronta. Discostandosi dalla mera lamentela, progettare e costruire nel Belpaese è un lavoro per certi versi “differente” se confrontato al fare architettura in altre zone geografiche prossime allo Stivale: assumere questo presupposto potrebbe aiutare a valutare l'internazionalità di determinate opere a prima vista “minori”. ELASTICOFarm è uno studio composto da più appostamenti, poiché dislocato tra geografie differenti che da est sfumano verso ovest: da Budoia, in provincia di Pordenone, passando per Chieri, in provincia di Torino, fino ad arrivare a Toronto, in Canada. \n \n[EN] Some authors, much more than others, require difficulty in being understood, as they require a reading that must consider, as a whole and in their contradiction, the ‘intrinsic’ rules that make up doing architecture in Italy. These are dictates linked to bureaucracy, economics, constraints, clients and the needs belonging to everyday life that every architecture office faces. Moving away from the mere complaint, designing and building in the Belpaese is in some ways a ‘different’ job when compared to doing architecture in other geographical areas close to the Boot: assuming this assumption could help to evaluate the internationality of certain works that at first sight seem ‘minor’. ELASTICOFarm is a studio composed of several locations, as it is spread across different geographies that fade from the east to the west: from Budoia, in the province of Pordenone, via Chieri, in the province of Turin, to Toronto, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAirIuav (Università Iuav di Venezia)Same topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207